Category Archives: News

Thought for the Week

What if the District put its attention into the classroom action instead of the courtroom action?

The District did confirm the other day that a second, California-based law firm has been engaged for the McKinstry legal case. That firm was paid approximately $50,000 this month, according to the Board’s Consent Agenda. This was on top of the $50,000 paid to the highly-regarded Greener law firm in Boise, who represents the District in the matter.

That’s over $100,000 for a single month’s legal work. What would $100,000 A MONTH buy the Blaine County School District if it were focused on work in the classroom, rather than the courtroom?

Classrooms, not Courtrooms!

1 Comment

Filed under analysis, Education, News

Two Letters Questioning Cost vs. Performance Value

Today’s Mt. Express published a letter written by Barbara and Spence Browning, which outlines BCSD Superintendent Lonnie Barber’s compensation package. The letter goes on to question such a generous compensation package while SAT scores have been solidly average while district spending has been 2 to 3 times what other districts spend. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under News

Guthrie and Bates’ Seats up for Election May 21st

In today’s Idaho Mountain Express, Terry Smith reports:

“Two Blaine County School District board of trustee seats now held by Chair Steve Guthrie and Trustee Paul Bates will be up for election in May.

“Both Guthrie and Bates confirmed this week that they plan to seek re-election.

“The School District announced Monday that it is accepting ‘declarations of candidacy’ and that the candidate-filing deadline is Friday, March 22, at 5 p.m.”

For the full article: School trustee seats are up for election

This election will be held in conjunction with the state primary election to be held May 21st.

1 Comment

Filed under News

Barber’s Contract Extended by Unanimous Vote

Last night, the BCSD Board of Trustees unanimously voted to extend Dr. Lonnie Barber’s contract, a package worth around $200,000/yr, for another year. This decision came after much public comment noting consistently mediocre BCSD SAT scores in spite of yearly spending approximately $20,000/student/year. The public comment also questioned the quality of the administration’s oversight of the McKinstry construction work; disagreements about this work has led to the current lawsuit between the BCSD administration and McKinstry. Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under News

Mid-Day Update: No On Barber, by Holmes Lundt

As of mid-day today, the No On Barber Campaign has delivered a letter to the Board of Trustees regarding the proposal tonight to extend Dr. Barber’s contract an additional year.

Since delivery, Poll Responses have continued to come in on the matter, many with comments regarding the respondents’ specific opposition to this “automatic” extension of such a lucrative contract.  The vast majority of responses have taken a balanced, even approach– very measured in recommending that the Trustees simply “Wait and See” what happens with the District’s copious problems and whether performance improves.  This seems prudent given the issues the District faces.  If the contract warrants being extended, there remains a full two years within which to do so.

Some responses have talked in specifics about test score trends and academic achievement.  Some have mentioned hiring and retention policies, including preferences made during hiring. Many notes have talked about the obvious “elephant in the room” regarding business management of the McKinstry debacle.  That no matter how the lawsuit resolves, one thing is crystal clear:  the District committed somewhere between $18 Million and $26 Million of our tax dollars to “something” without a clear understanding of whether there was even a contract in place. No matter how the suit shakes out, it seems like reckless behavior to place such a large amount of tax dollars at risk without a complete contract.   From a business oversight perspective alone, this seems like a basis to withhold a contract extension for the “CEO”.

By the end of the year, we’ll know much more about lawsuits and test scores and outcomes for kids.  Until then, the community is speaking with no ambiguity:  “Don’t extend the contract until we know more”.

1 Comment

Filed under News